The Difference Between CITES and the US Endangered Species Act.

1. Many aviculturists are confused about our wildlife laws and how they "interact" with each other. One of the most confusing points is that CITES Appendix I listed species are not always "US Endangered Species". This is because the USESA or United States Endangered Species Act protects or lists species that meet certain criteria, not necessarily the same as the criteria to list them on CITES Appendix I.
2. Many of the larger macaws are listed on CITES Appendix I, and therefore their International trade is prohibited except as captive- bred birds. CITES Appendix I includes the Spix's macaw, Lear's, Scarlet, Military, Buffon's, Caninde, Hyacinth, Red-fronted and Illiger's macaws.
3. Yet the USESA does not include any of these except the Spix's and Lear's macaws. So, for all intents and purposes here in the United States, we can freely exchange, breed, or possess any of these birds except the Lear's or Spix's macaw within our State, or in interstate commerce. To trade or sell a Spix's or Lear's macaw from one State to another would require federal permits. The arms of the CITES Convention only affect International movements at this point in time. The USFWS is working on incorporating many of the resolutions into our domestic laws for the future.
4. Currently the United States Endangered Species Act includes the following parrot species (found here in aviculture) and any movement across a State line that involves money or commerce would require federal permits. To loan or donate one of these species to another breeder in another State, or within your own State does not require the federal permit. It is also legal to sell these birds within your own State! NOTE: All of these species are also listed on CITES Appendix I and would require US Federal and CITES permits to ship in International Commerce.
   Lear's and Spix's Macaws, Vinaceous, Red-browed, Puerto Rican, Red- necked, Red-tailed, St. Vincent's, Cuban amazons. Golden Conures, Thick-billed parrots, Pileated Parrots (South American), Hooded parakeets.
5. Even though we call many of the parrot species now found on CITES Appendix I, Endangered, for our purposes here in the United States, they are not regulated unless we plan to ship them across an International border. The list of CITES Appendix I parrots is extensive and includes many of the birds we breed and sell into our domestic pet trade. For a complete list, you can contact the USFWS in Washington, at 800-358-2104.

Some of CITES resolutions pertaining to Parrots.

1. Parrots are an important focus under CITES. Literally every meeting of the Parties involves some discussion about parrots and their International trade under the treaty. The many NGO groups provide data pertaining to parrots in the wild, and the current status of their habitats and numbers. Many of the NGO groups that attend would be familiar to bird breeders. Some of them include the North American Falconer's Association, The Humane Society of the United States, PETA, Pet Industry Joint Advisory Counsel, Save the Whales, Animal Welfare Institute, Environmental Investigation Agency, AFA, WWF, Traffic, European Falconer's Association, and many, many more. These and other NGO organizations contribute their input to each and every discussion regarding the trade in birds and other animals.
2. CITES also has subcommittees. The one that would include birds is called the "CITES Animal's Committee". These committees are charged with gathering information to be presented at the formal Convention of the Parties. Much of the work that would pertain to the AFA is accomplished at this committee level. Thankfully the committee level is a little more personal than the COP meetings, and it is easier to raise concerns or present information that will then be used to formulate suggestions to the COP Parties.
3. One of the most important resolutions affecting parrot breeders pertains to International Trade in Appendix I species that were bred in captivity. The Convention provides for trade in Appendix I species as if they were on Appendix II- if they are bona fide captive-bred animals. On the surface it sounds like something very easy to qualify, however, the Parties have had much trouble defining "Bred in Captivity" in such a way that it would not affect "wild" birds and animals covered under Appendix I. Technically, the definition used can not affect any animal that was taken from the wild. Therefore, the definition that has been adopted eliminates all F1 (first generation captive-bred animals from qualifying because their parents were wild-caught). This way, to qualify as an animal "bred in captivity", an animal must be F2 (second generation captive-bred) or higher to be considered for trade as an Appendix II listed species. Furthermore, CITES has devised a "system of facility registration" where governmental organizations can verify that animals are actually being bred to the second generation. Unfortunately, the rules under these resolutions have been so confusing and so rigid that there are only a handful of registered bird breeding facilities that have even registered for this exemption under CITES. The whole system is being reviewed and will probably be changed at the next meeting of the COP.
4. Another subject of heated debate at these meetings is the term "for commercial purposes". Under the Convention, a government must ascertain whether a facility breeds its animals for "primarily commercial purposes" or whether they are a "non-commercial" entity. After many discussions it has been agreed that unless you breed an animal species for a direct release program or approved conservation program, you are considered a commercial breeder and therefore must qualify under the current registration scheme in order to engage in International trade with an Appendix I species...traded as Appendix II. On the surface this angers many breeders as they often consider themselves as a non-commercial breeder. But technically all breeding is commercially driven unless all offspring are placed back into a conservation program that directly benefits the wild population of the same species. This means that if you have only one pair of Appendix I birds, and you breed them and sell your offspring to other breeders or the pet trade, you are a commercial breeder! Even many zoos are considered "commercial facilities" if they do not participate in "Species Survival Plans" that eventually will directly benefit the species in the wild. Under CITES, the trade in CITES Appendix I species for commercial purposes is strictly controlled.
5. Habitat preservation and restoration is not a primary part of CITES and its resolutions at this time. However there have been several important discussions about how the Convention can begin to include such conservation. It will be very interesting to see just how they resolve this issue.

The AFA CITES Committee

1. The AFA has a committee devoted to CITES. This is not a new committee, but has been in existence for many years. If you research some of the old Watchbird Magazines, you will see that this committee goes way back, back to the time of the late Val Clear, and more recently, it was headed by the late Al McNabney.
2. The committee has been designing and selling lapel pins and artwork in order to fund attendance to the Animal's Committee meetings and the COP. MUCH of the credit and work is being accomplished by Lyrae Perry and Mark Moore, also of the AFA Store. The original concept of selling pins to fund the committee was my idea, but with input from the committee members it has become a major project including art prints of each pin subject, and limited edition prints, matted and framed and even sterling silver coins depicting the Spix's macaw. To see all the available products, visit the AFA's website at www.afabirds.org.
3. The purpose of the committee is to participate in the CITES meetings and to assist the USFWS when information about parrot breeding is needed. Of course this input often goes directly to the CITES Animal's committee, but you would be surprised how often we agree with what the USFWS offers on the same subjects. The USFWS has granted the AFA official NGO status, and the chairman of the Animal's committee has extended an official invitation for the AFA committee chair to attend the Animal's committee meetings.
4. If you have any specific questions as to the function of the AFA CITES Committee, please forward them to the moderators so we can answer them. I am very excited about AFA's participation in the International Conventions, and I am very proud of the accomplishments of this committee...we are virtually the ONLY U.S. parrot breeders that attend the CITES Conventions and Committee Meetings.

Paula Hansen, Northwest Regional Director and head of the Red Siskin Project offers her comments regarding the Red Sisken Project:

A little more to this regarding the my experience with the Red Siskin...It's on CITES 1 list and a Captive Breeding Permit (CBP) is required when shipping interstate and selling. This permit also requires a yearly report of any and all activity to USFWS and is renewable every three years. Some states also require their permit to keep this bird. Prior to applying for USFWS CBP you need to check your individual state's regulation and obtain that permit first then apply for the USFWS permit. To loan or donate requires documentation from one party to the other in order to prove the birds were not wild caught.